Notice how Ford is not desperate for Ranger to match total sales of  either Colorado/Canyon or Tacoma, it’s only a fraction of those sales. Theres a good reason for that, Bronco production is the main focus and Ranger costs are already heavily amortised thanks to ROW sales.   Maverick is something Ford saw fit to develop quickly and get to market exactly because it is one of those valuable niche products that works.

I'd love to have one to replace our Transit Connect, but it wasn't a good value due to price and range.   Also, because it was imported, it never qualified for the full EV tax credit. 

I think VW is looking to employ the improvements in the upgraded meb platform to the 2027 ID buzz.    We should know more next year with the redesigned id4, ID3, and the ID Polo. 

Merry Christmas/Happy Holidays!

Exact same power as my 1990 2.3L Ranger.  Just sayin.

You lost me at 1.0 EcoBoost. That engine does not belong in a truck. It struggled in the EcoSport by all accounts, it would be awful as a truck engine. 

Some just can't understand liking the way a vehicle looks regardless of how it's used.   

I agree.  It’s confusing

I mean. I guess.  I have virtually no usage for the off-road capability my Bronco has, but I bought it because I liked it. im sure most people don’t use their vehicles to capacity

well, according to sales, nearly everyone is the wrong demographic….