Jump to content

Fire and explosion damages magnesium supplier - could halt F-150 production


Recommended Posts

https://www.lansingstatejournal.com/story/news/local/2018/05/03/employees-meet-following-wednesdays-eaton-rapids-factory-fire/575359002/

 

What does this have to do with Ford you ask? Well this company is a big supplier for the F-series and Expy/Navi. KCAP has already been shut down and 2 shifts at Dearborn Stamping have been placed on an emergency TLO. Ford is trying their best to keep DTP and Kentucky Truck running as much as possible.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is the main detractor to "just in time" manufacturing processes....no "back stock" to absorb the loss due to unexpected interruptions for outside suppliers.

Not exactly true.

 

The back stock is a lot smaller, but usually the manufacturer or a shipping company has some stock. Maybe only a few days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is the main detractor to "just in time" manufacturing processes....no "back stock" to absorb the loss due to unexpected interruptions for outside suppliers.

works great in Japan or Germany where everything is on site, or even The Rouge back in the day before Ford sold the steel business.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not exactly true.

 

The back stock is a lot smaller, but usually the manufacturer or a shipping company has some stock. Maybe only a few days.

 

 

https://www.lansingstatejournal.com/story/news/local/2018/05/03/employees-meet-following-wednesdays-eaton-rapids-factory-fire/575359002/

 

What does this have to do with Ford you ask? Well this company is a big supplier for the F-series and Expy/Navi. KCAP has already been shut down and 2 shifts at Dearborn Stamping have been placed on an emergency TLO. Ford is trying their best to keep DTP and Kentucky Truck running as much as possible.

.

Sounds like they already blew through the supply in the chain Wiz...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like they already blew through the supply in the chain Wiz...

Ford keeps a lot of in plant inventory on larger parts very tight, a few hours of supply worth. In most cases it winds up being the more critical parts. Edited by fuzzymoomoo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure this is another area where Ford thought it saved a lot of money by doing things this way.....

 

The longer the stamping plant is out the quicker any remaining stock will dry up for Dearborn and Kentucky

Kansas City is already out so this is going to really start eating into F Series inventory..

 

Anyone know when Job 1 for MY19 begins as Ford might not need much of a run out clearance?

Edited by jpd80
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't they have at least 2 suppliers for parts? If they don't this is one of the reason they should. Place where I use to work if you didn't have at least 2 preferably 3 suppliers for a part, you had to change something so you did.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't they have at least 2 suppliers for parts? If they don't this is one of the reason they should. Place where I use to work if you didn't have at least 2 preferably 3 suppliers for a part, you had to change something so you did.

Unfortunately, I think we're going to see this kind of exposure from time to time, remember the frame shortage issue a few years back?

With Hakett ripping the guts out of vehicle costs in materials and supplier costs, this type of exposure could get more common

as the suits think that plants can continue on even with a shortage/ outage of critical parts...

Edited by jpd80
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.freep.com/story/money/cars/ford/2018/05/08/ford-f-150-production-fire-supplier-meridian/592898002/

Ford faces halt to F-150 production after fire, could idle 7,600 workers

Ford Motor faces a complete production shutdown of its profit-driving F-150 pickups for an unknown period of time.

 



The truck side of the Ford Kansas City Assembly Plant in Missouri shut down this week because of the parts shortage caused by the fire, sending about 3,600 workers home, Felker confirmed.

A decision is pending on when or if the Dearborn Truck Plant will shut down, which would affect another 4,000 workers.

"We will be making that decision shortly," Felker said.

The F-150, America's top-selling vehicle, is built only at the two sites. No date has been set for reopening the Kansas City plant, Felker confirmed.


"The company has informed us that we have enough parts to build vehicles through Thursday. The company is meeting continuously to find a solution to replace and manufacturer (sic) parts that were lost due to the fire at Meridian. According to the company, at some point we will have an interruption in production. At this time, the company doesn’t know for sure when or for how long we will be down. As a result of the fire, there is a great deal of uncertainty in our production schedule at DTP. Adjustments and changes are being made hour by hour as the company is engaged in getting the parts needed to maintain our normal production schedule."

Edited by Anthony
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, I think we're going to see this kind of exposure from time to time, remember the frame shortage issue a few years back?

With Hakett ripping the guts out of vehicle costs in materials and supplier costs, this type of exposure could get more common

as the suits think that plants can continue on even with a shortage/ outage of critical parts...

Save a dime now, spend a dollar later. Got to love it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For quite a few years now, the trend to go single source has been going on. It can reduce costs, but there is always the risk of a supplier issue causing interruptions in production. I guess the cost benefit vs risk were such that a manageable risk was acceptable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For quite a few years now, the trend to go single source has been going on. It can reduce costs, but there is always the risk of a supplier issue causing interruptions in production. I guess the cost benefit vs risk were such that a manageable risk was acceptable.

As long as you lay out the risk adequately so that everybody at Ford understands and signs off on the risk then that’s fine.

 

The danger comes when you underestimate the impact or you didn’t get signoff from the executives.

 

If you predict you’ll only lose $5M in profits every 5 years worst case but you can save $2M per year then that’s a good business decision.

 

But if it turns out you actually lose $20M because you miscalculated then you’re in the hole.

 

We used to call that kind of planning “smoking hole” - if all that is left of the building is a smoking hole in the ground, what are you going to do and how long will it take?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So if this fire was bad enough that the tooling got destroyed it could be a while before parts are available.

So if they had 2 vendors building this part the only additional cost would be the tooling cost. The price per part should be the same. No?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So if they had 2 vendors building this part the only additional cost would be the tooling cost. The price per part should be the same. No?

 

No, not necessarily. If you agree to buy 400k widgets from company A, they may give you a price of $1/widget. But, if you only buy 200k widgets, the price may be $1.10/widget due to loss of economies of scale. And company B may charge $1.15/widget if you buy 200. That can work out to a lot of money.

 

However, as we see here, it could cost a lot of money as well. It's all risk/benefit calculations that someone with a lot more knowledge in that area than me figures out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This isn't necessarily a "we can save money by sole-sourcing this thing" situation--sometimes there is only one source for something. If it's idling plants at Fiasco, BMW, and Mercedes, it sounds like it's more "only ballgame in town" than "cheapest ballgame in town."

 

And it's not like there's a whole lot of Mg in the F-Series, so this has to be something small, maybe a specialized part, like an airbag sensor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The shutdown will likely last several weeks which will be somewhat disasterous for Ford's bottomline. Looks like Expedition and Navigator just can't catch a break in particular.

This was updated today.

 

"In addition, Ford is working with the supplier to ensure it has enough key components to continue production of the Ford Expedition, Lincoln Navigator and Ford Explorer SUVs. For now, the automaker says final assembly of those SUVs is not changing".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...